AIMS: Central Asia vs Aruba: Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, both
AIMS: Central Asia
142
in 2023
Aruba
2
in 2016
AIMS: Central Asia rank
108th
Aruba rank
105th
Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, both over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Aruba
How they compare
AIMS: Central Asia currently reports 142 against 2 in Aruba, a difference of 140.
That makes AIMS: Central Asia's figure about 71.0 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 108th and Aruba ranks 105th of 113 groups.
AIMS: Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Aruba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 | 0 | 4.5 | AIMS: Central Asia |
| 2010s | 2.71 | 0.7143 | 2 | AIMS: Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound internationally mobile students from sub-saharan africa, both, AIMS: Central Asia or Aruba?
- AIMS: Central Asia, at 142 against 2 in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in inbound internationally mobile students from sub-saharan africa, both between AIMS: Central Asia and Aruba?
- 140, with AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Aruba?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Aruba rank globally for inbound internationally mobile students from sub-saharan africa, both?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 108th and Aruba ranks 105th of 113 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release