AIMS: Central Asia vs Iceland: Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa
AIMS: Central Asia
72.47
in 2023
Iceland
35
in 2023
AIMS: Central Asia rank
74th
Iceland rank
72nd
Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Iceland
How they compare
AIMS: Central Asia currently reports 72.47 against 35 in Iceland, a difference of 37.47.
That makes AIMS: Central Asia's figure about 2.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Iceland ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 74th and Iceland ranks 72nd of 75 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, AIMS: Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.93 | 10 | 8.07 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 50.99 | 29 | 21.99 | AIMS: Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound internationally mobile students from sub-saharan africa, AIMS: Central Asia or Iceland?
- AIMS: Central Asia, at 72.47 against 35 in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in inbound internationally mobile students from sub-saharan africa between AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 37.47, with AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland rank globally for inbound internationally mobile students from sub-saharan africa?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 74th and Iceland ranks 72nd of 75 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release