ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong: Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate)

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
1.55 GPIA
in 2020
Hong Kong
1.16 GPIA
in 2024
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank
4th
Hong Kong rank
5th

Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate) over time

  • ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
  • Hong Kong
00.511.5200320132024

How they compare

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) currently reports 1.55 GPIA against 1.16 GPIA in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.39 GPIA.

That makes ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)'s figure about 1.3 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) has been ahead every year.

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 200 groups.

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2010s 1.32 GPIA 1.2 GPIA 0.1168 GPIA ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
2020s 1.55 GPIA 1.23 GPIA 0.3185 GPIA ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (uis estimate), ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) or Hong Kong?
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108), at 1.55 GPIA against 1.16 GPIA in Hong Kong as of 2020.
What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (uis estimate) between ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong?
0.39 GPIA, with ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong rank globally for inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (uis estimate)?
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 200 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate) (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong: Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-adjusted-gender-parity-index-uis-estimate-gpia/eca-ecowas-unsdcode-98108/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-adjusted-gender-parity-index-uis-estimate-gpia/eca-ecowas-unsdcode-98108/hong-kong-sar-china/">ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong: Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate) (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
313 places, 5,600 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release