AIMS: Central Asia vs Iceland: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)
AIMS: Central Asia
5.9%
in 2023
Iceland
10.3%
in 2023
AIMS: Central Asia rank
42nd
Iceland rank
43rd
Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 10.3% against 5.9% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.8 times AIMS: Central Asia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 42nd and Iceland ranks 43rd of 211 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.2% | 2.4% | 0.2% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 4.3% | 2.3% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 2.0% | 6.8% | 4.8% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 5.6% | 9.1% | 3.4% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate), AIMS: Central Asia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 10.3% against 5.9% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate) between AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 4.4%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland rank globally for inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 42nd and Iceland ranks 43rd of 211 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release