China vs ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116): Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)

China
0.3%
in 2024
ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)
1.5%
in 2015
China rank
123rd
ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) rank
120th

Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • China
  • ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)
00.511.522.5200620152024

How they compare

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) currently reports 1.5% against 0.3% in China, a difference of 1.2%.

That makes ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)'s figure about 4.8 times China's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) has been ahead every year.

China ranks 123rd and ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ranks 120th of 134 countries.

ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2% 2.3% 2.1% ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)
2010s 0.3% 1.8% 1.5% ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate), China or ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)?
ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116), at 1.5% against 0.3% in China as of 2015.
What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate) between China and ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)?
1.2%, with ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116)?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
How do China and ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) rank globally for inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate)?
China ranks 123rd and ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116) ranks 120th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116): Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/china/eca-land-locked-countries-unsdcode-98116/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/china/eca-land-locked-countries-unsdcode-98116/">China vs ECA: Land-locked Countries (unsdcode:98116): Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
345 places, 7,127 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release