China vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)

China
0.3%
in 2024
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
1.5%
in 2023
China rank
123rd
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank
126th

Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • China
  • UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
012345199720102024

How they compare

UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa currently reports 1.5% against 0.3% in China, a difference of 1.2%.

That makes UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa's figure about 4.6 times China's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa has been ahead every year.

China ranks 123rd and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 126th of 134 countries.

UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2% 3.3% 3.1% UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
2010s 0.3% 2.0% 1.7% UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
2020s 0.4% 1.4% 1.0% UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate), China or UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa, at 1.5% against 0.3% in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate) between China and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
1.2%, with UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do China and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank globally for inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate)?
China ranks 123rd and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 126th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/china/unicef-eastern-and-southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/china/unicef-eastern-and-southern-africa/">China vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
345 places, 7,127 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release