ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) vs Zimbabwe: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
1.5%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.5%
in 2024
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) currently reports 1.5% against 0.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)'s figure about 3.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) has been ahead every year.
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 211 groups.
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate), ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) or Zimbabwe?
- ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110), at 1.5% against 0.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) and Zimbabwe?
- 1.0%, with ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) and Zimbabwe rank globally for inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 211 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release