ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) vs Zimbabwe: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)
ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126)
1.6%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
0.5%
in 2024
ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) currently reports 1.6% against 0.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126)'s figure about 3.3 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) has been ahead every year.
ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 211 groups.
ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate), ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) or Zimbabwe?
- ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126), at 1.6% against 0.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) and Zimbabwe?
- 1.1%, with ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) and Zimbabwe rank globally for inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- ECA: Sub-saharan Africa (unsdcode:98126) ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 211 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release