ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) vs Hong Kong, China: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)

ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204)
9.3%
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
25.3%
in 2024
ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) rank
17th
Hong Kong, China rank
14th

Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204)
  • Hong Kong, China
0510152025199820112024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 25.3% against 9.3% in ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204), a difference of 16.0%.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 2.7 times ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) ahead.

ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) ranks 17th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 211 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 5.5% 2.8% 2.8% ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204)
2010s 7.1% 9.7% 2.5% Hong Kong, China
2020s 8.7% 18.5% 9.9% Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate), ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 25.3% against 9.3% in ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) as of 2024.
What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) and Hong Kong, China?
16.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) and Hong Kong, China?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for inbound mobility rate, both sexes (uis estimate)?
ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) ranks 17th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 211 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) vs Hong Kong, China: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/ece-euro-area-e25-unsdcode-98204/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/inbound-mobility-rate-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/ece-euro-area-e25-unsdcode-98204/hong-kong-sar-china/">ECE: Euro Area (e25) (unsdcode:98204) vs Hong Kong, China: Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
345 places, 7,127 data points, 1997–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release