Cape Verde vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa: Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate)
Cape Verde
1.0%
in 2018
WB: Sub-saharan Africa
1.9%
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
95th
WB: Sub-saharan Africa rank
93rd
Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) over time
- Cape Verde
- WB: Sub-saharan Africa
How they compare
WB: Sub-saharan Africa currently reports 1.9% against 1.0% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes WB: Sub-saharan Africa's figure about 1.8 times Cape Verde's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, WB: Sub-saharan Africa has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 95th and WB: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 93rd of 118 countries.
WB: Sub-saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound mobility rate, female (uis estimate), Cape Verde or WB: Sub-saharan Africa?
- WB: Sub-saharan Africa, at 1.9% against 1.0% in Cape Verde as of 2021.
- What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, female (uis estimate) between Cape Verde and WB: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 0.9%, with WB: Sub-saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and WB: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Cape Verde and WB: Sub-saharan Africa rank globally for inbound mobility rate, female (uis estimate)?
- Cape Verde ranks 95th and WB: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 93rd of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release