ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Rwanda: Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate)
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
3.0%
in 2020
Rwanda
5.4%
in 2024
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank
59th
Rwanda rank
57th
Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) over time
- ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 5.4% against 3.0% in ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108), a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.8 times ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2013 it was ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ahead.
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 201 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) |
| 2020s | 3.0% | 3.6% | 0.6% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inbound mobility rate, female (uis estimate), ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 5.4% against 3.0% in ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in inbound mobility rate, female (uis estimate) between ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Rwanda?
- 2.4%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Rwanda?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Rwanda rank globally for inbound mobility rate, female (uis estimate)?
- ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 201 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release