Congo vs Zimbabwe: Labor force, total, per capita
Congo
0.4073 units per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.4044 units per person
in 2025
Congo rank
130th
Zimbabwe rank
131st
Labor force, total, per capita over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.4073 units per person against 0.4044 units per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0029 units per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 188 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3871 units per person | 0.363 units per person | 0.0241 units per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.3987 units per person | 0.3813 units per person | 0.0175 units per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.3978 units per person | 0.3736 units per person | 0.0242 units per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.3955 units per person | 0.3896 units per person | 0.006 units per person | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, total, per capita, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 0.4073 units per person against 0.4044 units per person in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, total, per capita between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0029 units per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor force, total, per capita?
- Congo ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.