Gambia vs Nepal: Labor force, total, per capita
Gambia
0.2861 units per person
in 2025
Nepal
0.2824 units per person
in 2025
Gambia rank
173rd
Nepal rank
175th
Labor force, total, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Nepal
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.2861 units per person against 0.2824 units per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.0037 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 173rd and Nepal ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.259 units per person | 0.2432 units per person | 0.0158 units per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.261 units per person | 0.2506 units per person | 0.0104 units per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.2702 units per person | 0.2684 units per person | 0.0018 units per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.281 units per person | 0.2799 units per person | 0.0012 units per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, total, per capita, Gambia or Nepal?
- Gambia, at 0.2861 units per person against 0.2824 units per person in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, total, per capita between Gambia and Nepal?
- 0.0037 units per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Nepal?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Nepal rank globally for labor force, total, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 173rd and Nepal ranks 175th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.