What is the difference in labor force, total, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Iceland?

0.75 units per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central African Republic vs Iceland: Labor force, total, per square kilometre

Central African Republic

3.09 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland

2.34 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Central African Republic rank

176th

Iceland rank

178th

Labor force, total, per square kilometre over time

Central African Republic
Iceland

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3.09 units per square kilometre against 2.34 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.75 units per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 176th and Iceland ranks 178th of 186 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Central African Republic	Iceland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.1 units per square kilometre	1.49 units per square kilometre	0.6123 units per square kilometre	Central African Republic
2000s	2.69 units per square kilometre	1.78 units per square kilometre	0.9173 units per square kilometre	Central African Republic
2010s	2.86 units per square kilometre	2.01 units per square kilometre	0.8543 units per square kilometre	Central African Republic
2020s	3.04 units per square kilometre	2.26 units per square kilometre	0.7875 units per square kilometre	Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, total, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Iceland?: Central African Republic, at 3.09 units per square kilometre against 2.34 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in labor force, total, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Iceland?: 0.75 units per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for labor force, total, per square kilometre?: Central African Republic ranks 176th and Iceland ranks 178th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Iceland: Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/">Central African Republic vs Iceland: Labor force, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labor force, total, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Labor force, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.