East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Singapore: Labor force, total, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
71.51 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
5,045 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
3rd
Singapore rank
2nd

Labor force, total, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Singapore
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199020062023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 5,045 units per square kilometre against 71.51 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 4,973 units per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 70.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 44 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 56.42 units per square kilometre 2,645 units per square kilometre 2,588 units per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 64.28 units per square kilometre 3,456 units per square kilometre 3,392 units per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 69.65 units per square kilometre 4,586 units per square kilometre 4,516 units per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 70.69 units per square kilometre 4,839 units per square kilometre 4,769 units per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, total, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Singapore?
Singapore, at 5,045 units per square kilometre against 71.51 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in labor force, total, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Singapore?
4,973 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Singapore?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Singapore rank globally for labor force, total, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Singapore: Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/singapore/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Singapore: Labor force, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor force, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labor force, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.