East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong, China: Labor force, total, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
70.94 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
3,667 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
4th
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Labor force, total, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Hong Kong, China
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199020062023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 3,667 units per square kilometre against 70.94 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 3,596 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 51.7 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 44 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 55.99 units per square kilometre 3,007 units per square kilometre 2,951 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 63.8 units per square kilometre 3,352 units per square kilometre 3,288 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 69.13 units per square kilometre 3,671 units per square kilometre 3,602 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 70.14 units per square kilometre 3,672 units per square kilometre 3,602 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, total, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 3,667 units per square kilometre against 70.94 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in labor force, total, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong, China?
3,596 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong, China?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for labor force, total, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong, China: Labor force, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hong-kong-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong, China: Labor force, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor force, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labor force, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.