What is the difference in labor force, total, per unit of gdp between South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?

0.0002 units per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?

36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labor force, total, per unit of GDP

South Asia

0.0002 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Tanzania, United Republic of

0.0004 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

South Asia rank

14th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

15th

Labor force, total, per unit of GDP over time

South Asia
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in South Asia, a difference of 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 2.4 times South Asia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

South Asia ranks 14th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 44 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	South Asia	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0017 units per US$ of GDP	0.0007 units per US$ of GDP	Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s	0.0006 units per US$ of GDP	0.001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0004 units per US$ of GDP	Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	0.0005 units per US$ of GDP	0.0003 units per US$ of GDP	Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	0.0004 units per US$ of GDP	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, total, per unit of gdp, South Asia or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in labor force, total, per unit of gdp between South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for labor force, total, per unit of gdp?: South Asia ranks 14th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labor force, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-total-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia/tanzania/">South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labor force, total, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labor force, total, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 233 places, 8,231 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Labor force, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.