South Sudan vs Tanzania: Labor force, total, per unit of GDP
South Sudan
0.0004 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Tanzania
0.0004 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan rank
14th
Tanzania rank
15th
Labor force, total, per unit of GDP over time
- South Sudan
- Tanzania
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 14th and Tanzania ranks 15th of 185 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, total, per unit of gdp, South Sudan or Tanzania?
- South Sudan, at 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania as of 2015.
- What is the difference in labor force, total, per unit of gdp between South Sudan and Tanzania?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tanzania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do South Sudan and Tanzania rank globally for labor force, total, per unit of gdp?
- South Sudan ranks 14th and Tanzania ranks 15th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.