AIMS: Pacific vs Aruba: Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in
AIMS: Pacific
0.5%
in 2019
Aruba
2.9%
in 2018
AIMS: Pacific rank
11th
Aruba rank
13th
Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Aruba
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.9% against 0.5% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 5.5 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 11th and Aruba ranks 13th of 221 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: Pacific averaged higher in 2 and Aruba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Aruba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.5% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 1.2% | 0.6% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in, AIMS: Pacific or Aruba?
- Aruba, at 2.9% against 0.5% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in between AIMS: Pacific and Aruba?
- 2.4%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Aruba?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Aruba rank globally for mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 11th and Aruba ranks 13th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release