AIMS: Pacific vs Naoero: Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in
AIMS: Pacific
0.6%
in 2023
Naoero
19.5%
in 2023
AIMS: Pacific rank
8th
Naoero rank
5th
Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 19.5% against 0.6% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 18.9%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 34.2 times AIMS: Pacific's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 8th and Naoero ranks 5th of 221 groups.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6% | 19.9% | 19.3% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 20.2% | 19.6% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in, AIMS: Pacific or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 19.5% against 0.6% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in between AIMS: Pacific and Naoero?
- 18.9%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Naoero?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Naoero rank globally for mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 8th and Naoero ranks 5th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release