AIMS: Asia and the Pacific vs Macao: Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
58.8%
in 2024
Macao
88.3%
in 2024
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific rank
18th
Macao rank
16th
Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 88.3% against 58.8% in AIMS: Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 29.5%.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.5 times AIMS: Asia and the Pacific's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ranks 18th and Macao ranks 16th of 183 groups.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Asia and the Pacific | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.7% | 93.4% | 36.7% | Macao |
| 2020s | 57.5% | 85.3% | 27.8% | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes, AIMS: Asia and the Pacific or Macao?
- Macao, at 88.3% against 58.8% in AIMS: Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes between AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Macao?
- 29.5%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Macao?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Macao rank globally for net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes?
- AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ranks 18th and Macao ranks 16th of 183 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release