AIMS: Pacific vs Belarus: Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development
AIMS: Pacific
46.0%
in 2024
Belarus
72.5%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
7th
Belarus rank
4th
Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 72.5% against 46.0% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 26.5%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times AIMS: Pacific's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 7th and Belarus ranks 4th of 105 groups.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.1% | 56.8% | 17.7% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 44.7% | 68.8% | 24.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development, AIMS: Pacific or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 72.5% against 46.0% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development between AIMS: Pacific and Belarus?
- 26.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Belarus rank globally for net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 7th and Belarus ranks 4th of 105 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release