Aruba vs SDG: Australia and New Zealand: Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female
Aruba
98.9%
in 2013
SDG: Australia and New Zealand
83.6%
in 2024
Aruba rank
11th
SDG: Australia and New Zealand rank
11th
Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female over time
- Aruba
- SDG: Australia and New Zealand
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 98.9% against 83.6% in SDG: Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 15.3%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times SDG: Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 11th and SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th of 176 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | SDG: Australia and New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.7% | 48.1% | 45.6% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 98.9% | 54.6% | 44.3% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female, Aruba or SDG: Australia and New Zealand?
- Aruba, at 98.9% against 83.6% in SDG: Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female between Aruba and SDG: Australia and New Zealand?
- 15.3%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and SDG: Australia and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Aruba and SDG: Australia and New Zealand rank globally for net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female?
- Aruba ranks 11th and SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release