Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound)
Aruba
7.5%
in 2016
Hong Kong, China
8.0%
in 2023
Aruba rank
24th
Hong Kong, China rank
22nd
Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound) over time
- Aruba
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 8.0% against 7.5% in Aruba, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 24th and Hong Kong, China ranks 22nd of 133 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -4.2% | -17.0% | 12.8% | Aruba |
| 2010s | -1.0% | -3.4% | 2.3% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound), Aruba or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 8.0% against 7.5% in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound) between Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.5%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
- How do Aruba and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound)?
- Aruba ranks 24th and Hong Kong, China ranks 22nd of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release