Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound)
Hong Kong, China
8.0%
in 2023
Latvia
7.3%
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
22nd
Latvia rank
25th
Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 8.0% against 7.3% in Latvia, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 22nd and Latvia ranks 25th of 133 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -16.0% | -1.6% | 14.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | -2.2% | -0.7% | 1.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 5.6% | 6.4% | 0.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound), Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 8.0% against 7.3% in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound) between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 0.7%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 22nd and Latvia ranks 25th of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release