Aruba vs Liechtenstein: Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound)
Aruba
-15.5%
in 2016
Liechtenstein
-18.2%
in 2021
Aruba rank
97th
Liechtenstein rank
99th
Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound) over time
- Aruba
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Aruba currently reports -15.5% against -18.2% in Liechtenstein, a difference of 2.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 97th and Liechtenstein ranks 99th of 115 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -20.7% | -102.3% | 81.6% | Aruba |
| 2010s | -23.0% | -37.3% | 14.3% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound), Aruba or Liechtenstein?
- Aruba, at -15.5% against -18.2% in Liechtenstein as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound) between Aruba and Liechtenstein?
- 2.7%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Liechtenstein?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2016.
- How do Aruba and Liechtenstein rank globally for net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound)?
- Aruba ranks 97th and Liechtenstein ranks 99th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release