Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0351 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0417 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
52nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
49th

Number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0417 units per square kilometre against 0.0351 units per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0066 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 52nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th of 195 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0921 units per square kilometre 0.1419 units per square kilometre 0.0497 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0736 units per square kilometre 0.2105 units per square kilometre 0.1369 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0735 units per square kilometre 0.2564 units per square kilometre 0.1829 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.1004 units per square kilometre 0.1689 units per square kilometre 0.0684 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0507 units per square kilometre 0.0786 units per square kilometre 0.028 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0368 units per square kilometre 0.044 units per square kilometre 0.0072 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0417 units per square kilometre against 0.0351 units per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0066 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 52nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-under-five-deaths-female-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-under-five-deaths-female-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of under-five deaths, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 11,881 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Number of under-five deaths, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.