ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) vs Macau, China: Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate)

ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)
3.9%
in 2015
Macau, China
4.4%
in 2023
ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) rank
106th
Macau, China rank
105th

Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)
  • Macau, China
2.557.51012.515199720102023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 4.4% against 3.9% in ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117), a difference of 0.5%.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.1 times ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1999 it was ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) ahead.

ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) ranks 106th and Macau, China ranks 105th of 218 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) averaged higher in 2 and Macau, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) Macau, China Difference Ahead
1990s 15.3% 10.5% 4.8% ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)
2000s 9.1% 5.3% 3.8% ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117)
2010s 4.2% 7.1% 2.9% Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (uis estimate), ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 4.4% against 3.9% in ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) and Macau, China?
0.5%, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) and Macau, China?
17 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
How do ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) and Macau, China rank globally for outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (uis estimate)?
ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) ranks 106th and Macau, China ranks 105th of 218 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) vs Macau, China: Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-all-regions-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-land-locked-ldcs-unsdcode-98117/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-all-regions-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-land-locked-ldcs-unsdcode-98117/macao-sar-china/">ECA: Land-locked Ldcs (unsdcode:98117) vs Macau, China: Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
393 places, 8,885 data points, 1997–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release