ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate)
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
5.1%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
12.7%
in 2015
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) rank
48th
Zimbabwe rank
51st
Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 12.7% against 5.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201), a difference of 7.6%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.5 times ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (uis estimate), ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 12.7% against 5.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Zimbabwe?
- 7.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release