Aruba vs ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108): Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate)
Aruba
8.6%
in 2016
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
4.3%
in 2020
Aruba rank
36th
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank
39th
Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) over time
- Aruba
- ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 8.6% against 4.3% in ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108), a difference of 4.3%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.0 times ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ahead.
Aruba ranks 36th and ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 39th of 135 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (uis estimate), Aruba or ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)?
- Aruba, at 8.6% against 4.3% in ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (uis estimate) between Aruba and ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)?
- 4.3%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
- How do Aruba and ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (uis estimate)?
- Aruba ranks 36th and ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 39th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release