Namibia vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate)
Namibia
4.3%
in 2022
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
3.7%
in 2019
Namibia rank
72nd
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank
72nd
Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) over time
- Namibia
- WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 4.3% against 3.7% in WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 72nd and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 72nd of 135 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (uis estimate), Namibia or WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
- Namibia, at 4.3% against 3.7% in WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations as of 2022.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (uis estimate) between Namibia and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
- 0.6%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank globally for outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (uis estimate)?
- Namibia ranks 72nd and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 72nd of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release