ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS)

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
0.3%
in 2020
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2023
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) rank
107th
Hong Kong, China rank
110th

Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS) over time

  • ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
  • Hong Kong, China
00.10.20.3201120172023

How they compare

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) currently reports 0.3% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.3%.

That makes ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)'s figure about 11.3 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) has been ahead every year.

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 107th and Hong Kong, China ranks 110th of 217 groups.

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)
2020s 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to central and eastern europe, female (uis), ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) or Hong Kong, China?
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108), at 0.3% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to central and eastern europe, female (uis) between ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong, China?
0.3%, with ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong, China?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to central and eastern europe, female (uis)?
ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) ranks 107th and Hong Kong, China ranks 110th of 217 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-and-eastern-europe-female-uis-estimate-percent/eca-ecowas-unsdcode-98108/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-and-eastern-europe-female-uis-estimate-percent/eca-ecowas-unsdcode-98108/hong-kong-sar-china/">ECA: Ecowas (unsdcode:98108) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
372 places, 4,275 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release