Latvia vs WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS)

Latvia
0.6%
in 2023
WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations
0.7%
in 2019
Latvia rank
40th
WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank
37th

Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS) over time

  • Latvia
  • WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations
0.20.40.60.8201120172023

How they compare

WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations currently reports 0.7% against 0.6% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 40th and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 37th of 155 countries.

WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to central and eastern europe, female (uis), Latvia or WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations, at 0.7% against 0.6% in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to central and eastern europe, female (uis) between Latvia and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
0.1%, with WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
How do Latvia and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to central and eastern europe, female (uis)?
Latvia ranks 40th and WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 37th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-and-eastern-europe-female-uis-estimate-percent/latvia/wb-fy23-ida-and-ibrd-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-and-eastern-europe-female-uis-estimate-percent/latvia/wb-fy23-ida-and-ibrd-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/">Latvia vs WB: Fy23 Ida & Ibrd Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
372 places, 4,275 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release