ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
0.0%
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2023
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) rank
122nd
Hong Kong, China rank
123rd

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time

  • ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
  • Hong Kong, China
00.0050.010.015199720102023

How they compare

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)'s figure about 41.6 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) has been ahead every year.

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 122nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 123rd of 221 groups.

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
2020s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate), ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) or Hong Kong, China?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) between ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Hong Kong, China?
0.0%, with ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Hong Kong, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 122nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 123rd of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/hong-kong-sar-china/">ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Hong Kong, China: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
430 places, 10,171 data points, 1997–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release