Australia vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate)

Australia
0.0%
in 2023
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
0.0%
in 2023
Australia rank
71st
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries rank
70th

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) over time

  • Australia
  • UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
00.010.020.030.04201120172023

How they compare

UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries's figure about 20.5 times Australia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 71st and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ranks 70th of 193 countries.

UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
2020s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to central asia, female (uis estimate), Australia or UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to central asia, female (uis estimate) between Australia and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
0.0%, with UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Australia and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, female (uis estimate)?
Australia ranks 71st and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ranks 70th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-female-uis-estimate-percent/australia/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-female-uis-estimate-percent/australia/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa-programme-countries/">Australia vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 4,734 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release