Kenya vs WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate)

Kenya
0.0%
in 2017
WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations
0.0%
in 2019
Kenya rank
94th
WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank
92nd

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) over time

  • Kenya
  • WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations
00.0050.010.0150.02201120152019

How they compare

WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations's figure about 50.6 times Kenya's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 94th and WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 92nd of 193 countries.

WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to central asia, female (uis estimate), Kenya or WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Kenya as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to central asia, female (uis estimate) between Kenya and WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
0.0%, with WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
How do Kenya and WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, female (uis estimate)?
Kenya ranks 94th and WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 92nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-female-uis-estimate-percent/kenya/wb-fy23-ida-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-female-uis-estimate-percent/kenya/wb-fy23-ida-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/">Kenya vs WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 4,734 data points, 2011–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release