AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Eswatini: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
0.7%
in 2023
Eswatini
0.6%
in 2013
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
44th
Eswatini rank
45th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
  • Eswatini
00.20.40.60.8199620092023

How they compare

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific currently reports 0.7% against 0.6% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1%.

That makes AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific has been ahead every year.

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 44th and Eswatini ranks 45th of 218 groups.

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
2000s 0.7% 0.3% 0.4% AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
2010s 0.7% 0.5% 0.3% AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Eswatini?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, at 0.7% against 0.6% in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Eswatini?
0.1%, with AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Eswatini?
10 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2013.
How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Eswatini rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 44th and Eswatini ranks 45th of 218 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Eswatini: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/eswatini/">AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Eswatini: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release