AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs New Zealand: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
0.7%
in 2023
New Zealand
0.6%
in 2018
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
44th
New Zealand rank
41st
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- New Zealand
How they compare
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific currently reports 0.7% against 0.6% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was New Zealand ahead.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 44th and New Zealand ranks 41st of 218 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or New Zealand?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, at 0.7% against 0.6% in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and New Zealand rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 44th and New Zealand ranks 41st of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release