AIMS: Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)
AIMS: Pacific
0.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0.8%
in 2015
AIMS: Pacific rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
35th
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), AIMS: Pacific or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.8% against 0.8% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2015.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between AIMS: Pacific and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release