Aruba vs ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411): Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

Aruba
7.7%
in 2016
ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)
1.8%
in 2019
Aruba rank
10th
ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) rank
9th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • Aruba
  • ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)
02468199620072019

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 7.7% against 1.8% in ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411), a difference of 5.9%.

That makes Aruba's figure about 4.3 times ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) ahead.

Aruba ranks 10th and ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) ranks 9th of 174 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)
2000s 0.1% 0.9% 0.8% ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)
2010s 4.7% 1.4% 3.3% Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), Aruba or ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)?
Aruba, at 7.7% against 1.8% in ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) as of 2016.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between Aruba and ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)?
5.9%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)?
20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2016.
How do Aruba and ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
Aruba ranks 10th and ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) ranks 9th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411): Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/aruba/escap-ldc-ldc-e-unsdcode-98411/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/aruba/escap-ldc-ldc-e-unsdcode-98411/">Aruba vs ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411): Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release