China vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

China
0.7%
in 2023
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
0.7%
in 2023
China rank
38th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
39th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • China
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
00.20.40.60.8199620092023

How they compare

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in China, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was China ahead.

China ranks 38th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 39th of 174 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8% 0.7% 0.1% China
2000s 0.8% 0.7% 0.1% China
2010s 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% China
2020s 0.7% 0.8% 0.0% UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), China or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, at 0.7% against 0.7% in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between China and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
0.0%, with UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do China and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
China ranks 38th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 39th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/china/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/china/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">China vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release