Congo vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

Congo
0.1%
in 2017
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
0.4%
in 2019
Congo rank
93rd
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank
96th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • Congo
  • WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
0.10.20.30.40.5199620072019

How they compare

WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations currently reports 0.4% against 0.1% in Congo, a difference of 0.3%.

That makes WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations's figure about 2.7 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ahead.

Congo ranks 93rd and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 96th of 174 countries.

WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
2000s 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations
2010s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), Congo or WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations, at 0.4% against 0.1% in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between Congo and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
0.3%, with WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations?
10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2017.
How do Congo and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
Congo ranks 93rd and WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations ranks 96th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/congo-rep/wb-fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/congo-rep/wb-fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations/">Congo vs WB: Fragile and Conflict Affected Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release