ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) vs Japan: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109)
0.4%
in 2016
Japan
0.1%
in 2018
ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) rank
90th
Japan rank
89th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109)
  • Japan
00.20.40.60.81199620072018

How they compare

ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) currently reports 0.4% against 0.1% in Japan, a difference of 0.3%.

That makes ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109)'s figure about 2.7 times Japan's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) has been ahead every year.

ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) ranks 90th and Japan ranks 89th of 218 groups.

ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9% 0.1% 0.9% ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109)
2010s 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) or Japan?
ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109), at 0.4% against 0.1% in Japan as of 2016.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) and Japan?
0.3%, with ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) and Japan?
6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2016.
How do ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) and Japan rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) ranks 90th and Japan ranks 89th of 218 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) vs Japan: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-igad-unsdcode-98109/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-igad-unsdcode-98109/japan/">ECA: Igad (unsdcode:98109) vs Japan: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release