ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Georgia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
0.2%
in 2019
Georgia
0.0%
in 2018
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) rank
155th
Georgia rank
157th

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
  • Georgia
00.20.40.6199620072019

How they compare

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) currently reports 0.2% against 0.0% in Georgia, a difference of 0.2%.

That makes ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)'s figure about 8.4 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1997 it was ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ahead.

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 155th and Georgia ranks 157th of 218 groups.

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
2000s 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
2010s 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) or Georgia?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119), at 0.2% against 0.0% in Georgia as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Georgia?
0.2%, with ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Georgia?
22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
How do ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Georgia rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 155th and Georgia ranks 157th of 218 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Georgia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/georgia/">ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Georgia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release