ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)
ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418)
0.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0.8%
in 2015
ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
35th
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time
- ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418), a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.8% against 0.8% in ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
- ESCAP: Pacific (pac) (unsdcode:98418) ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release