GPE: Region 2 vs Latvia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)
GPE: Region 2
0.3%
in 2019
Latvia
0.1%
in 2018
GPE: Region 2 rank
118th
Latvia rank
117th
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time
- GPE: Region 2
- Latvia
How they compare
GPE: Region 2 currently reports 0.3% against 0.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes GPE: Region 2's figure about 3.9 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was GPE: Region 2 ahead.
GPE: Region 2 ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 117th of 218 groups.
GPE: Region 2 has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | GPE: Region 2 | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | GPE: Region 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | GPE: Region 2 |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | GPE: Region 2 |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), GPE: Region 2 or Latvia?
- GPE: Region 2, at 0.3% against 0.1% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between GPE: Region 2 and Latvia?
- 0.2%, with GPE: Region 2 ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for GPE: Region 2 and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do GPE: Region 2 and Latvia rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
- GPE: Region 2 ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 117th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release