Sao Tome and Principe vs SDG: Central and Southern Asia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)

Sao Tome and Principe
0.3%
in 2015
SDG: Central and Southern Asia
0.5%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
71st
SDG: Central and Southern Asia rank
71st

Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • SDG: Central and Southern Asia
00.20.40.60.8199620072019

How they compare

SDG: Central and Southern Asia currently reports 0.5% against 0.3% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.2%.

That makes SDG: Central and Southern Asia's figure about 1.9 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 71st and SDG: Central and Southern Asia ranks 71st of 174 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe SDG: Central and Southern Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), Sao Tome and Principe or SDG: Central and Southern Asia?
SDG: Central and Southern Asia, at 0.5% against 0.3% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between Sao Tome and Principe and SDG: Central and Southern Asia?
0.2%, with SDG: Central and Southern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and SDG: Central and Southern Asia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and SDG: Central and Southern Asia rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 71st and SDG: Central and Southern Asia ranks 71st of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs SDG: Central and Southern Asia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/sao-tome-and-principe/sdg-central-and-southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-east-asia-and-the-pacific-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/sao-tome-and-principe/sdg-central-and-southern-asia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs SDG: Central and Southern Asia: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
392 places, 8,021 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release