WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) vs Zimbabwe: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS)
WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)
0.7%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.8%
in 2015
WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
35th
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS) over time
- WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.8% against 0.7% in WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd), a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 218 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis), WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.8% against 0.7% in WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis) between WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) and Zimbabwe rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia and the pacific, both sexes (uis)?
- WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release