AIMS: East Asia vs Chad: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)
AIMS: East Asia
0.5%
in 2023
Chad
0.3%
in 2015
AIMS: East Asia rank
43rd
Chad rank
43rd
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Chad
How they compare
AIMS: East Asia currently reports 0.5% against 0.3% in Chad, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes AIMS: East Asia's figure about 1.4 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1997 it was AIMS: East Asia ahead.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 43rd and Chad ranks 43rd of 218 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: East Asia averaged higher in 2 and Chad in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.2% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate), AIMS: East Asia or Chad?
- AIMS: East Asia, at 0.5% against 0.3% in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate) between AIMS: East Asia and Chad?
- 0.2%, with AIMS: East Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Chad?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2015.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Chad rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 43rd and Chad ranks 43rd of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release