AIMS: Pacific vs Uruguay: Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate)
AIMS: Pacific
0.1%
in 2019
Uruguay
0.0%
in 2018
AIMS: Pacific rank
168th
Uruguay rank
167th
Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Uruguay
How they compare
AIMS: Pacific currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes AIMS: Pacific's figure about 13.6 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 168th and Uruguay ranks 167th of 218 groups.
AIMS: Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | AIMS: Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate), AIMS: Pacific or Uruguay?
- AIMS: Pacific, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate) between AIMS: Pacific and Uruguay?
- 0.1%, with AIMS: Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Uruguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Uruguay rank globally for outbound mobility ratio to east asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 168th and Uruguay ranks 167th of 218 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release